Switzerland’s third-largest wealth manager, Julius Baer Group Ltd., agreed to pay $547 million to avoid U.S. prosecution and admitted it helped American clients hide billions of dollars in assets from tax authorities while coaching its bankers on how to avoid detection.
The bank made detailed admissions of wrongdoing and prosecutors agreed to drop a conspiracy charge in three years if the bank abides by the terms of the deal filed Thursday in federal court in Manhattan.
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at [email protected].
Thank you.
Two of its client advisers, Daniela Casadei and Fabio Frazzetto, who were charged in 2011, also pleaded guilty to conspiracy charges. They each face a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and will be sentenced in August.
Julius Baer admitted conspiring with US taxpayer clients, since the 1990s, to hide up to $4.7 billion in assets from the IRS. It settled under a deferred prosecution agreement, which means the company is charged with a crime that is later dismissed if it makes a payment, complies with certain conditions, and makes a detailed statement of facts about its wrongdoing.
The IRS statement said that in furtherance of the scheme to help U.S. taxpayers hide assets from the IRS and evade taxes, Julius Baer undertook, among other actions, the following:
- Entering into “code word agreements” with U.S. taxpayer-clients under which Julius Baer agreed not to identify the U.S. taxpayers by name within the bank or on bank documents, but rather to identify the U.S. taxpayers by code name or number, in order to reduce the risk that U.S. tax authorities would learn the identities of the U.S. taxpayers.
- Opening and maintaining accounts for many U.S. taxpayer-clients held in the name of non-U.S. corporations, foundations, trusts, or other legal entities or non-U.S. relatives, thereby helping such U.S. taxpayers conceal their beneficial ownership of the accounts.
As part of the settlement, the bank admitted that it gave its bankers a memo called “U.S. Clients Do’s and Don’ts” to coach them on how to avoid suspicion when they came to visit American clients with assets not declared to the IRS.
“When filling out the entry form . . . say that you are in Banking (never lie) but if and when asked in which field, respond “EDP Dept.” “Investment Banking” or “Lending, ” but certainly not Private Banking, ” the memo read.
It went on: “When asked by Officer what you will do while in the USA, say Business and of course some leisure, trying to take some time to enjoy your beautiful country. Proud government employees usually love this type of statement. One can throw in skydiving or another fun sport/activity . . . (carrying a tennis racket also puts the emphasis on “fun and games, ” and not on business).”
“Bank Julius Baer not only turned a blind eye to tax avoiders, but actually conspired with them to break the law, ” said Manhattan US attorney Preet Bharara in a statement. “Together with our partners at the IRS, we will continue to prosecute financial institutions and individuals who facilitate tax evasion.”
Julius Baer was one of about a dozen banks put under criminal investigation by the DoJ in 2011 for tax evasion by American clients. Credit Suisse and UBS paid fines of $2.6 billion and $780 million to settle their respective investigations.
Many smaller, Swiss banks have avoided prosecution by voluntarily disclosing their wrongdoing as part of a separate DoJ programme, where total penalties stand at about $1.4 billion.
Banks still under investigation by the DoJ include the Swiss unit of HSBC, Europe’s biggest lender.
At its high-water mark in 2007, Julius Baer had approximately $4.7 billion in assets under management relating to approximately 2, 589 undeclared accounts held by U.S. taxpayer-clients. From 2001 through 2011, Julius Baer earned approximately $87 million in profit on approximately $219 million gross revenues from its undeclared U.S. taxpayer accounts, including accounts held through structures.
READ MORE: Julius Baer
While other banks are bleeding millions, Julius Baer Group said it sustained no losses in the days following the Swiss Central Bank’s sudden decision to cancel its franc cap, according to Bloomberg. More…
Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak retired for good from politics before his country’s last election in 2013. The move came after he had made a comeback as leader of the Labor Party, serving as defense More…
After winding down his career in politics, the multi-talented Barak has made a return to the world of finance and commerce, where he feels equally at home, representing the exclusive Jewish Owned Swiss merchant More…
Julius Baer Group Ltd., Switzerland’s third-largest wealth manager, may have to pay more than it anticipated to settle a case with the U.S. Justice Department over American offshore accounts, the Swiss newspaper More…
Julius Baer has not held merger talks with rival Credit Suisse, the Zurich-based private bank’s CEO Boris Collardi told the weekly Schweiz am Sonntag (Switzerland on Sunday), Reuters reported. “There More…
Julius Baer, a private Swiss bank, is staying away from European bonds, prefers investing in REITs, and isn’t overly concerned about the prospect of Greece leaving the European Union, according to wealthbriefing.com. When More…
Doom and gloom was pronounced on Swiss banks in the wake of the Swiss central bank’s removal of the cap on the nation’s currency, but private Zurich-based Julius Baer is showing resilience with a More…
Julius Baer may not exactly be unscathed by the crisis in the Swiss Franc, according to the Financial Times. In the days following the Swiss National Bank’s move to remove the cap from the Swiss franc, More…
The Swiss National Bank made the shocking move of eliminating its currency cap on the Swiss franc, and many banks lost money. Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and Barclay’s suffered joint losses of $400 million because More…
