Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Jewish Business News

Court

Interns Lawsuit Brought Against ‘Black Swans’ Overturned


black swan2

The victory in a lawsuit brought by a group of interns against the producers of the Oscar winning movie “Black Swan” has been overturned by an appellate court. The interns had previously won against the 2010 film which was directed by Darren Aronofsky and starred the Israeli born actress Natalie Portman.

Portman won the Oscar for the best performance by an actress for her role in the film.

Please help us out :
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at [email protected].
Thank you.

Two interns, Alex Footman and Eric Glatt, brought the suit in 2011 claiming that the producers violated labor laws by having unpaid interns do work on the movie. They brought the suit on behalf of more than 100 people who worked as unpaid interns. It was brought against Fox Searchlight Pictures which produced the movie.

The plaintiffs sought back pay in what is considered to be a landmark case because, whatever the final ruling, it will affect America’s much relied upon business model of using unpaid interns to do the grunt work in all manner of fields, from entertainment to the media and major corporations.

In 2013, district judge William Paley III agreed. The appeal hearing was held on January 30th in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

That judge, John Walker, ruled that while the letter of the federal labor statutes may have been violated, previous Supreme Court decisions held that unpaid internships were kosher since they offered the interns a learning experience and a chance to advance in a certain industry.

The judge wrote, “In sum, we agree with the defendants that the proper question is whether the intern or the employer is the primary beneficiary of the relationship. On defendants’ interlocutory appeal, we VACATE the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment to Glatt and Footman, VACATE its order certifying Antalik’s New York class, VACATE its order conditionally certifying Antalik’s nationwide collective, and REMAND for further proceedings.”

You can expect this one to go to the Supreme Court.

Newsletter



Advertisement

You May Also Like

World News

In the 15th Nov 2015 edition of Israel’s good news, the highlights include:   ·         A new Israeli treatment brings hope to relapsed leukemia...

Life-Style Health

Medint’s medical researchers provide data-driven insights to help patients make decisions; It is affordable- hundreds rather than thousands of dollars

Entertainment

The Movie The Professional is what made Natalie Portman a Lolita.

Travel

After two decades without a rating system in Israel, at the end of 2012 an international tender for hotel rating was published.  Invited to place bids...