Bild mit Häusern or Painting with Houses
The Lewenstein Family failed again in its bid for the restitution of the Russian artist Wassily Kandinsky’s Bild mit Häusern or Painting with Houses. An Amsterdam court ruled against the family on Wednesday who are heirs of the painting’s original owners. The work by the avant-garde artist, titled Painting with Houses, was sold in October 1940, five months after the German Wehrmacht took over the Netherlands.
Valued at $22 million and looted by Nazis during World War II, the painting is currently held in the Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam. The court today upheld a 2018 ruling by The Restitution Committee of the Netherlands. That committee had determined that Painting with Houses was jointly owned by Robert Lewenstein and his wife Irma Klein. After World War II when they separated the painting became her property alone, according to the agreement made by the couple, so she was allowed to sell it.
The Committee’s report on the painting’s disposition stated that it, “took the interests of Irma Klein’s heir and the city council into account in its final conclusion. A key point for the Committee in this case was that art had not been stolen or confiscated. After the war Irma Klein made no attempt to get the painting back. Furthermore, her heir has no special bond with it. The Committee also considered it important that the city council bought the painting in good faith and that the work has a significant place in the Stedelijk Museum’s collection. The Committee concluded on the grounds of these interests that the city council is not obliged to restitute the painting.”
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at [email protected].
Thank you.
But the Lewenstein Family points out that the painting was originally looted by Nazis during the German occupation of Holland in World War II and was later sold under duress.
James Palmer, a lawyer who represents the Lewenstein Family, condemned the court’s decision and says that the family will appeal it. “If this court decision is left unchallenged then Dutch restitution policy will effectively be non-existent, and important looted art in The Netherlands will likely never be restituted,” he said.
“After many years of struggles, the Lewenstein family is very disappointed that the Amsterdam District Court did not recognize the Lewenstein family’s rights to the restitution of its property, which was misappropriated during the Holocaust.”
The Stedelijk Museum in Amsterdam describes Painting with Houses (1909) by Russian artist Wassily Kandinsky as one of the most colorful paintings in its collection as well as one of the most remarkable. It says that, “this painting makes the sensation of Kandinsky’s first steps in his pioneering search for a freer, abstract painting almost palpable. After centuries in which painting was primarily the art of representation, what inspired Kandinsky – as one of the first – to strive for abstract, non-representational, art? He himself had several explanations.”
