Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Jewish Business News

World Politics

Gorbachev thinks new Union in Old borders of USSR is possible

On 8 December 1991 the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus signed Belavezha Accords on the dissolution of USSR;
Twenty five years after his resignation the former Soviet leader in an interview with TASS explained why he had not arrested the heads of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus who dissolved the USSR

Mikhail Gorbachev © Alexander Scherbak TASS - Russia

Twenty five years after his resignation, former USSR President Mikhail Gorbachev, the first and last president of the USSR,  thinks that the formation of a new Union in the borders of the former Soviet Union is indeed possible.

“The Soviet Union cannot be restored. But a new Union can be established. In the former borders, with the same members, on the basis of free will, ” Gorbachev said in an interview with TASS dedicated to the 25th anniversary of the collapse of USSR. “I think a new Union is possible.”

Please help us out :
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at
Thank you.


  • On 8 December 1991 the leaders of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus Boris Yeltsin, Leonid Kravchuk and Stanislav Sushkevich signed the Belavezha Accords on the dissolution of USSR and establishment of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).
  • On 25 December 1991 Mikhail Gorbachev resigned from the position of USSR president.
  •  On December 25, Mikhail Gorbachev, resigned from his post.

Here is the full interview made 25 years later:
Who is still responsible for the Soviet Union’s collapse? 

― I do not decline my share of responsibility. But my conscience is clear. I was defending the USSR till the very end. Reforming and refreshing the Soviet Union was necessary and possible.

When did it go wrong and what could have been changed?

― I think the coup attempt (in August 1991) had most serious consequences. The coup was a protest of bureaucracy. I had to break up with that gang, that’s the only word that describes them. Boris Yeltsin got ill-tempered, he just did not realize that his role was important but it does not imply what he started to do. And what he started to do was the struggle against the Union’s center.

I think he was a man of great potential but his uncontrollable striving for power, it never stopped… I left him a plenum member but dismissed him from the post of the Central Committee’s Secretary, I left him on the post similar to ministerial. He had to be dealt with… That’s all.

Everyone should recall how he behaved, what he was doing or not doing during those fatal days. I’d like to remind you that the overwhelming majority of the Russian Supreme Council’s deputies voted for the Belavezha Accords, including Communists, who are now crying foul about the catastrophic consequences and accusing Gorbachev of everything.

A question is often raised during the discussion of the causes of the Soviet Union’s collapse – why Gorbachev did not order to arrest Boris Yeltsin, Ukrainian leader Leonid Kravchuk and Belarusian parliament chairman Stanislav Shushkevich in Belovezh Forest.

― I did not know what was the purpose of that gathering.

So, the special services did not report anything?

― No. And I talked to him (Yeltsin). He said he was going there (to the Belovezha Forest) at an invitation of the locals, Shushkevich. The Ukrainian leader was also supposed to go there. I said that he should talk to them, especially, the Ukrainian leader as the Soviet Union was impossible without Ukraine. Meanwhile, he (Yeltsin) took part in the drafting of the new treaty, and there are his signatures and he agreed to everything. But he was playing along…

But could you have arrested them?

― I think this would smell of a civil war. It would have been dangerous to do this to retain power instead of using democratic methods.

 My credo is democracy, resolute changes in favor of democracy, expulsion of the totalitarian regime with no blood. But there was blood. There were local conflicts. And we see what happens when very resolute people set to work. The resolution should be different. The resolution should be in the defense of principles. That’s what happened at the Congress (of the USSR people’s deputies).

The price of preserving the Soviet Union in a way that you are talking about… I think it would smell of big trouble. The fire would have engulfed the whole country.

I did a different thing ― I gave up power. I resigned to avoid bloodshed. That’s all. And they became the leaders.

Did Washington support the collapse of the USSR, was it their goal?

― I cannot say they were doing this, especially, in the beginning. No one thought that the Soviet Union could be eliminated. And then they started helping… And were rubbing their hands as they were fighting with Russia for almost 100 years and it fell into pieces by itself…

Is the Soviet Union’s restoration possible? What do you think?

― The Soviet Union cannot be restored. But a new Union can be established.

 In the former borders?

― In the former borders, with the same members, on the basis of free will. I think a new Union is possible.

(Interviewed by Boris Klin)



You May Also Like

World News

In the 15th Nov 2015 edition of Israel’s good news, the highlights include:   ·         A new Israeli treatment brings hope to relapsed leukemia...


The Movie The Professional is what made Natalie Portman a Lolita.


After two decades without a rating system in Israel, at the end of 2012 an international tender for hotel rating was published.  Invited to place bids...

VC, Investments

You may not become a millionaire, but there is a lot to learn from George Soros.

Copyright © 2021 Jewish Business News