Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Jewish Business News

Blogs

Attacking ISIS, Obama Will Only Repeat the Disasters of his Predecessor

President Obama Addresses The Nation To Outline Strategy On ISIS

Far from being a fan of ISIS, who represent the very worst in Islamic culture, I nevertheless believe President Obama should leave them alone and not attempt to remove them from the face of the earth, as he has promised a few days ago.

ISIS serves a very important purpose, it is actually a source of stability in the region, and as such should be left to its own devices. Yes, the West must protect its assets in the region, and, yes, care must be taken to bolster innocent bystanders like the Kurds and the kingdom of Jordan against the onslaught of the Islamic ninjas. Other than that, to paraphrase a popular sentiment: don’t just do something, stand there.

Nature abhors a vacuum. Back in the 7th century, as the Roman Empire was losing its oomph in the Middle East, the Arab hordes, led by Muhammad, rushed out of the Arabian peninsula and grabbed all that nice, free property, never to let go of most of it again. This is precisely what ISIS, the new Muslim hordes in the very same region, have been doing.

Thirteen years ago, Barbara Bush’s less gifted son decided to remove the only man in the region who was able, using cruelty, paranoia and a voracious appetite for power, to stop the Iranian Shiite empire from expanding and gaining a hegemony in the region. That wondrous man was Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and when he fell, he left a vacuum that was quickly filled by Iran and its Shiite allies inside Iraq.

In essence, the United States spent trillions of dollars and countless lives, American and Arab, to give Iran the primacy it so desired in that part of the world. Yes, that was some idiotic move.

And as President Obama decided to cut America’s losses and pull out of the region en mass, he forced the Sunis to get up and make a move before it was too late. So they did. Taking advantage of the vacuum left by Obama’s America, ISIS has been running through the region like knife through hot butter. And that’s a very good thing.

Because ISIS, despite their obvious religious fanaticism, are realists. They want money and land, which they’ve taken’ and they want a reliable and well equipped army, which they’ve also taken, from America’s Iraqi clients.

But they’ve been staying out of areas where they know they’d get a bloody nose. While attacking women and children wherever they could, ISIS soldiers have kept away from serious confrontations with the IDF and the Jordanian Legion. They’re not interested in fighting for the sake of fighting alone, they’re looking for rewards. So, like I said, that’s a good thing.

The big service ISIS is doing the West right now is checking Iranian power, just as the Suni rebels inside Syria are keeping the Iranian agent Hezbollah in check, and just as the PLO is keeping Hamas in check, at least to some degree.

It’s a volatile region, where violent, crazed men will always make life terrible for their weaker, more productive, less sociopath neighbors. But now the crazies are balancing one another, like a circle of snakes, each keeping the tail of the next snake in its clenched jaws.

Israel and the West could do worse, by helping any of these brutes. Let them keep each other busy for decades, and let’s wish all of them much success in their bloody endeavors.

Oh, and if you’re a journalist looking to interview these guys – use Skype, for heaven’s sake.

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Annie22

    September 22, 2014 at 9:02 pm

    Bush had Iran controlled by sanctions, which Obama
    largely removed. We did not need Hussein to control Iran for us.
    ISIS consists of 30,000 hot heads who control nothing except small,
    unprotected areas, lost by other people in other wars. I don’t know
    why we would need anyones help to manage such a puny, unimportant
    group. It’s like allowing a wild fraternity to take over a college.

    Bush gave Iraq democracy and instead of helping them
    with a new system, Obama left. Assad was ready to step down once
    America was involved, but instead of arming the rebels, we insisted
    that Iran participate in the talks, further empowering Assad.
    America doesn’t need ISIS, America needs new leadership

  2. Justa Ju

    September 22, 2014 at 10:34 pm

    Annie22 Bush gave Iraq democracy? Wait, I fell off my seat laughing again… Just a moment… Bush gave… Oh, my God, fell again… Wait, I’ll try one more time… Bush gave Iraq… No, i can’t, I’m on the floor again.

  3. Annie22

    September 23, 2014 at 2:47 pm

    You don’t remember the elections of 2005 and how proud
    the Iraqis were and the risk they took to vote? They elected Maliki
    a Shiite leader of a Shiite nation after being under Sunni Hussein’s
    control from 1979 to 2003. Democracy was new and we should have
    stayed longer to guide them.

  4. Justa Ju

    September 23, 2014 at 4:04 pm

    Annie22 We shouldn’t have gone into Iraq in the first place, and I’m talking 1990. It was an unnecessary act against our loyal ally in the region, Saddam Hussein. We mucked it all up real good.

  5. Annie22

    September 23, 2014 at 9:06 pm

    Justa Ju, I’m having trouble with “reply.”
    In the 1990s, Hussein invaded Kuwait, a tiny country,
    and stole her oil. We united with the Arab League to toss him out.
    We had a prolonged war with scuds, etc while Hussein attacked Israel
    who wasn’t involved in the war and at our request, didn’t fight back.
    We succeeded in removing Hussein from Kuwait, but the League
    wouldn’t force him from power (too many of them were vulnerable).
    And so Hussein continued torturing and imprisoning his people,
    killing the Kurds, while his sons raped and held women hostage who
    wouldn’t date them. The Iraqis have never complained about our
    getting rid of Hussein.

    BTW, cute name.

  6. Annie22

    September 23, 2014 at 9:08 pm

    Justa Ju Annie22 

    In the 1990s, Hussein invaded Kuwait, a tiny country,
    and stole her oil. We united with the Arab League to toss him out.
    We had a prolonged war with scuds, etc while Hussein attacked Israel
    who wasn’t involved in the war and at our request, didn’t fight back.
    We succeeded in removing Hussein from Kuwait, but the League
    wouldn’t force him from power (too many of them were vulnerable).
    And so Hussein continued torturing and imprisoning his people,
    killing the Kurds, while his sons raped and held women hostage who
    wouldn’t date them. The Iraqis have never complained about our
    getting rid of Hussein.

    BTW, cute name.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Newsletter

Advertisement

You May Also Like

World News

In the 15th Nov 2015 edition of Israel’s good news, the highlights include:   ·         A new Israeli treatment brings hope to relapsed leukemia...

Travel

After two decades without a rating system in Israel, at the end of 2012 an international tender for hotel rating was published.  Invited to place bids...

empty

The contract signed between the Israeli government and Pfizer shows clearly and unequivocally that this is a clinical study on humans - The agreement...

VC, Investments

You may not become a millionaire, but there is a lot to learn from George Soros.

Advertisement
cialis cialis satış cialis