Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Jewish Business News

Life & Style

Blurred Lines Study: Are People Turned on Less Knowing an Image Is AI Generated?

Images perceived as real photographs elicited significantly higher self-reported sexual arousal compared to those presented without any authenticity information.

AI generated

The world of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, with the ability to create incredibly realistic fake images of sexy women becoming commonplace. This raises fascinating questions about how we perceive and respond to these digital creations, particularly in the realm of sexual arousal. Does believing an image is real make it more arousing?

A recent study published in the journal Cognition and Emotion delves into this very question. Researchers, Alessandro Demichelis and Alessandro Ansani, were curious about the impact of perceived authenticity on self-reported sexual arousal.

Please help us out :
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at
Thank you.

“With AI advancements, we can now generate images that aren’t real but appear incredibly real,” Demichelis and Ansani explained in a joint statement to PsyPost. “Some of these images can be sexually suggestive. We wanted to understand how much believing an image is real or fake affects reported arousal levels. Specifically, can AI-generated images elicit the same level of arousal as real ones, or do real photographs still hold an edge?”

The study involved 165 participants divided into two groups. The first group (57 participants) viewed images presented as real photographs. The second, larger group (108 participants) saw the same images but without any indication of their authenticity. All participants viewed 60 images depicting models in underwear. Following each image, participants rated their level of sexual arousal on a clear six-point scale ranging from “not at all” to “very much.” This allowed researchers to gauge a nuanced response.

The study then employed a second task that shifted the focus to perception. Participants were presented with the same images again, but this time with a different objective: to assess their perceived authenticity. Essentially, they had to decide whether the image was a real photograph or an AI-generated creation. This binary choice – real photograph or AI-generated – helped researchers understand if participants’ perception of authenticity influenced their arousal levels.

By combining these two tasks, the study aimed to answer a key question: Do images believed to be real photographs elicit a stronger sexual arousal response compared to those perceived as AI-generated? This investigation sheds light on the power of perceived authenticity and its potential influence on our physiological reactions.

The study revealed a clear trend. Images perceived as real photographs elicited significantly higher self-reported sexual arousal compared to those presented without any authenticity information. This finding aligns with existing research on how fictional narratives can downregulate emotional responses. Simply put, when we know something is fictional, our brains tend to dampen our emotional response to it. This study suggests the same principle applies to sexual arousal – images perceived as fake are less arousing than those we believe depict real people.

This research has significant implications for understanding how we interact with and respond to increasingly sophisticated AI-generated imagery. It highlights the potential impact of perceived authenticity on our emotional responses, particularly in the realm of sexual arousal.

However, this study is just the beginning of a larger conversation. Further research could explore the underlying psychological mechanisms at play. For example, does the perceived attractiveness of the model in the image influence the outcome? Additionally, how does the type of image – a still photograph or a moving video – affect the results? Cultural factors might also play a role. Do people from different cultures perceive authenticity differently, and how does that influence their response?

Ultimately, understanding how we respond to artificial images is crucial in a world where technology can blur the lines between real and fake. This research contributes valuable insights into this complex interplay, paving the way for further exploration and deeper understanding. As AI technology continues to evolve, so too will our understanding of how it shapes our perception and behavior, including the realm of human sexuality.



You May Also Like

World News

In the 15th Nov 2015 edition of Israel’s good news, the highlights include:   ·         A new Israeli treatment brings hope to relapsed leukemia...


The Movie The Professional is what made Natalie Portman a Lolita.


After two decades without a rating system in Israel, at the end of 2012 an international tender for hotel rating was published.  Invited to place bids...

VC, Investments

You may not become a millionaire, but there is a lot to learn from George Soros.