Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Jewish Business News

Court

Historical hearing: Supreme Court opens Deliberations on Petitions to Bar Netanyahu For Forming Government

Historical hearing: the High Court began hearing on Sunday against petitions against the government by a criminal defendant and against the coalition agreement signed between the Likud and the blue, which includes – for the first time in state history – unprecedented move Where two prime ministers are simultaneously being sworn in.

The hearing opens at 10:00 and is held before a panel of 11 judges, chaired by Supreme Court President Esther Haim. Today’s debate is about whether a defendant indicted could form a government, but tomorrow’s hearing – around the coalition agreement – will be just as significant.

Please help us out :
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at [email protected].
Thank you.

Eleven Supreme Court judges to discuss petitions to ban Netanyahu from forming coalition

Outside the Supreme Court building, there have been demonstrations for and against Supreme Court justices this morning. Activists of the Movement for Quality Government read: “Backing the judges and urging them not to give a person accused of bribing the mandate to assemble the government.”

On Thursday, Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit delivered his legal opinion to the court. In his opinion, there is no impediment to a member of the Knesset accused of criminal action forming a government. In his response, he admitted that there were significant difficulties in the matter, but nevertheless – there is no ground for judicial intervention.

With regard to the coalition agreement, the Attorney General added, it is better to check the legality of the agreement at the time of its implementation, and not at this time. “The final decision on the legality and constitutionality of the individual arrangements should be examined only after the legislative procedures are completed – and against the practical implementation of the provisions of the agreement.”

Mendelblit addressed the circumstances surrounding the decision, writing that “The decision to impose the government’s role on Netanyahu is called for in an unprecedented national emergency – both because of the unprecedented political situation we have been in for a year and five months, following three Knesset election campaigns; and because of the national emergency. In it, the state, in dealing with the Corona epidemic, has all the difficulties involved. ”

 

Newsletter



Advertisement

You May Also Like

World News

In the 15th Nov 2015 edition of Israel’s good news, the highlights include:   ·         A new Israeli treatment brings hope to relapsed leukemia...

Life-Style Health

Medint’s medical researchers provide data-driven insights to help patients make decisions; It is affordable- hundreds rather than thousands of dollars

Entertainment

The Movie The Professional is what made Natalie Portman a Lolita.

Travel

After two decades without a rating system in Israel, at the end of 2012 an international tender for hotel rating was published.  Invited to place bids...