Paul Krugman is not pulling any punches with his criticisms of President Elect Donald Trump. The economist by profession turned liberal political pundit continues to blur the line between being an expert commentator and a political being.
So Comey and Putin installed a crazy, vindictive can't-handle-the-truth person in the White House. Scary. pic.twitter.com/pr3WPT9HYH
Please help us out :
Will you offer us a hand? Every gift, regardless of size, fuels our future.
Your critical contribution enables us to maintain our independence from shareholders or wealthy owners, allowing us to keep up reporting without bias. It means we can continue to make Jewish Business News available to everyone.
You can support us for as little as $1 via PayPal at office@jewishbusinessnews.com.
Thank you.— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 27, 2016
Just look at his most recent Tweets. The one above shows that Krugman is clearly in the “FBI Director James Comey Gave Trump the election camp.” And the New York Times contributor is also holding to the “Vladimir Putin rigged the election” conspiracy theory. Even The White House is dismissive of that one.
And the one below accuses Donald Trump of being no better than a Latin American dictator. This one does go too far.
As others have been saying: OK to note Trump's crazy tweets, but big story is still our rapid descent into banana-republic corruption
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 27, 2016
Paul Krugman was all over Twitter in the days before Thanksgiving to vent his frustration over the election results. In just one day he shot out a series of angry tweets aimed at Donald Trump.
The economist said things like: “We’re about to enter, or may already have entered, an era of corrupt governance unprecedented in U.S. history. What does it mean?”
“de facto personal bribes to the U.S. president. Putin’s Russia or, for that matter, Xi’s China, will be fine with sending huge business.”
“to the profiteer-in-chief. And that will cause a tilt of U.S. policy toward authoritarian regimes. Stay alert.”
“Important to realize that the money stolen by the first family is a minor issue; $10 billion, say, skimmed off the top is rounding error.”
We think that the world has gotten Paul Krugman’s message. Perhaps he is competing with Donald Trump for the record of most angry tweets in a single day.
Something I haven't been seeing: Trump's Education pick is married to Amway heir; in 2011 Amway paid $150 million to settle fraud charges 1/
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 27, 2016
Plenty of people have already criticized Donald Trump’s choice for Education Secretary given her business record in for profit education. But in the above tweet Paul Krugman devolves into guilt by association.
I try to be charitable, but when you read about Trump voters now worried about losing Obamacare it's kind of hard https://t.co/LkpUSCM8p0
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 26, 2016
With this last post, Paul Krugman definitely has a point. It has often been pointed out that rural voters in America who vote Republican tend to vote against their own interests. They do not benefit from tax cuts so much and many are living in poverty and dependent on Federal assistance in the form of Welfare and food stamps.
The problem with what Krugman is doing is that the need for short bursts of content makes Twitter a poor platform for any serious political discourse. He is also doing pretty much what so many have been criticizing Donald Trump for doing; making ad hominem attacks on social media.
Paul Krugman has suffered from a credibility problem for some time now. His position as an important intellectual in America is based on his economic expertise. But his crossing over into the world of political punditry diminishes his authority as an economist.
Now Paul Krugman is belittling himself by getting down into the dirty world of social media sound bites.
